On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 at 07:56, vignesh C wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 16:29, Juan José Santamaría Flecha
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 3:51 PM Frédéric Yhuel
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8/17/23 14:00, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
> >> > On 8/17/23 09:32, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
> >> >> On
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 16:29, Juan José Santamaría Flecha
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 3:51 PM Frédéric Yhuel
> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/17/23 14:00, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
>> > On 8/17/23 09:32, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
>> >> On 8/10/23 17:06, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
>> >>> Recently I r
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 3:51 PM Frédéric Yhuel
wrote:
> On 8/17/23 14:00, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
> > On 8/17/23 09:32, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
> >> On 8/10/23 17:06, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
> >>> Recently I restored a database from a directory format backup and
> >>> having this feature w
On 8/17/23 14:00, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
On 8/17/23 09:32, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
On 8/10/23 17:06, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
Recently I restored a database from a directory format backup and
having this feature would have been quite useful
Hi,
Thanks for resuming work on this
On 8/17/23 09:32, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
On 8/10/23 17:06, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
Recently I restored a database from a directory format backup and
having this feature would have been quite useful
Hi,
Thanks for resuming work on this patch. I forgot to mention this in my
origi
On 8/10/23 17:06, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
Recently I restored a database from a directory format backup and having
this feature would have been quite useful
Hi,
Thanks for resuming work on this patch. I forgot to mention this in my
original email, but the motivation was also to
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 5:06 PM Juan José Santamaría Flecha <
juanjo.santama...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>> As there is no new patch submitted I will go ahead and do that, please
>> feel
>> free to resubmit when there is renewed interest in wor
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> As there is no new patch submitted I will go ahead and do that, please feel
> free to resubmit when there is renewed interest in working on this.
>
>
Recently I restored a database from a directory format backup and having
this feature w
> On 20 Mar 2023, at 16:48, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
> On 3/20/23 15:58, Gregory Stark (as CFM) wrote:
>> Should we move it to next release at this
>> point? Even if you get time to work on it this commitfest do you think
>> it's likely to be committable in the next few weeks?
>
> It is very unlike
On 3/20/23 15:58, Gregory Stark (as CFM) wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 11:37, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
I've planned to work on it full time on week 10 (6-10 March), if you
agree to bear with me. The idea would be to bootstrap my brain on it,
and then continue to work on it from time to time.
On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 11:37, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
>
> I've planned to work on it full time on week 10 (6-10 March), if you
> agree to bear with me. The idea would be to bootstrap my brain on it,
> and then continue to work on it from time to time.
Any updates on this patch? Should we move it to
On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 22:06, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/11/22 06:29, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> > 2022年7月26日(火) 20:58 Frédéric Yhuel :
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4/14/22 14:25, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 3/19/22 01:57, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
> I looked at your patc
On 12/11/22 06:29, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
2022年7月26日(火) 20:58 Frédéric Yhuel :
On 4/14/22 14:25, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
On 3/19/22 01:57, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
I looked at your patch and it's a good idea to make foreign key
validation
use parallel query on large relations.
It
2022年7月26日(火) 20:58 Frédéric Yhuel :
>
>
>
> On 4/14/22 14:25, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3/19/22 01:57, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
> >> I looked at your patch and it's a good idea to make foreign key
> >> validation
> >> use parallel query on large relations.
> >>
> >> It would be valuabl
On 4/14/22 14:25, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
On 3/19/22 01:57, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
I looked at your patch and it's a good idea to make foreign key
validation
use parallel query on large relations.
It would be valuable to add logging to ensure that the ActiveSnapshot
and TransactionSnaps
On 3/19/22 01:57, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
I looked at your patch and it's a good idea to make foreign key validation
use parallel query on large relations.
It would be valuable to add logging to ensure that the ActiveSnapshot and
TransactionSnapshot
is the same for the leader and the worke
I looked at your patch and it's a good idea to make foreign key validation
use parallel query on large relations.
It would be valuable to add logging to ensure that the ActiveSnapshot and
TransactionSnapshot
is the same for the leader and the workers. This logging could be tested in the
TAP tes
Hello, sorry for the late reply.
On 2/14/22 15:33, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 5:26 AM Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
I noticed that referential integrity checks aren't currently
parallelized. Is it on purpose?
It's not 100% clear to me that it is safe. But on the other hand, it's
also
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 5:26 AM Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
> I noticed that referential integrity checks aren't currently
> parallelized. Is it on purpose?
It's not 100% clear to me that it is safe. But on the other hand, it's
also not 100% clear to me that it is unsafe.
Generally, I only added CURSOR
On 2/11/22 00:16, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
On 2/7/22 11:26, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
Attached is a (naive) patch that aims to fix the case of a FK
addition, but the handling of the flag CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK,
generally speaking, looks rather hackish.
Thanks, for the patch. You can add it to t
On 2/7/22 11:26, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
Attached is a (naive) patch that aims to fix the case of a FK addition,
but the handling of the flag CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK, generally speaking,
looks rather hackish.
Thanks, for the patch. You can add it to the current open commitfest
(https://commitfes
.postgresql.org/docs/current/when-can-parallel-query-be-used.htmlFrom 1353a4b7e7d08b13cbaa85a5f9ae26819b5cf2c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric=20Yhuel?=
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2022 13:31:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Allow parallel plan for referential integrity checks
---
s
22 matches
Mail list logo
