On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 5:39 PM Nisha Moond wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 3:48 PM shveta malik wrote:
> >
> >
> > With the given script, the problem reproduces on Head and PG17. We are
> > trying to reproduce the issue on PG16 and below where injection points
> > are not there.
> >
>
Hi,
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 3:48 PM shveta malik wrote:
>
>
> With the given script, the problem reproduces on Head and PG17. We are
> trying to reproduce the issue on PG16 and below where injection points
> are not there.
>
The issue can also be reproduced on PostgreSQL versions 13 through 16.
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 9:16 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 4:22 PM Dilip Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 3:48 PM shveta malik wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > It is a spin-off thread from earlier discussions at [1] and [2].
> > >
> > > While analyzing the s
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:15 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 11:59 AM Dilip Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 9:16 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 4:22 PM Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 3:48 PM shveta malik
>
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 11:59 AM Dilip Kumar wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 9:16 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 4:22 PM Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 3:48 PM shveta malik
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > It is a spin-off t
Hi Dilip,
On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 08:29, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> What I meant wasn’t that the subscriber is moving the confirmed LSN
> backward, nor was I suggesting we fix it by persisting the LSN on the
> subscriber side. My point was: the fact that the subscriber is sending
> an LSN older than on
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 4:22 PM Dilip Kumar wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 3:48 PM shveta malik wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > It is a spin-off thread from earlier discussions at [1] and [2].
> >
> > While analyzing the slot-sync BF failure as stated in [1], it was
> > observed that there are
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 3:48 PM shveta malik wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> It is a spin-off thread from earlier discussions at [1] and [2].
>
> While analyzing the slot-sync BF failure as stated in [1], it was
> observed that there are chances that confirmed_flush_lsn may move
> backward depending on the
Hi All,
It is a spin-off thread from earlier discussions at [1] and [2].
While analyzing the slot-sync BF failure as stated in [1], it was
observed that there are chances that confirmed_flush_lsn may move
backward depending on the feedback messages received from the
downstream system. It was susp
