On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 12:23:00PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 01:10:25PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> xlog.c can be a good read to check the assumptions WAL replay relies
>> on, with things like CheckRecoveryConsistency() or
>> reachedConsistency.
>
> That should
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 01:10:25PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> xlog.c can be a good read to check the assumptions WAL replay relies
> on, with things like CheckRecoveryConsistency() or
> reachedConsistency.
That should only stand for a WAL expected to be missing right? For something
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:18:11AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 07:19:48AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
>>> Can the postgres server ever have/generate out of sequence WAL files?
>>> For instance, 0001020C00A2, 0001020C00A3,
>>>
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 07:19:48AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> >
> > Can the postgres server ever have/generate out of sequence WAL files?
> > For instance, 0001020C00A2, 0001020C00A3,
> > 0001020C00A5 and so on, missing 0001020C00A4.
> >
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 7:45 AM Bharath Rupireddy
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can the postgres server ever have/generate out of sequence WAL files?
> For instance, 0001020C00A2, 0001020C00A3,
> 0001020C00A5 and so on, missing 0001020C00A4.
>
Hi,
Can the postgres server ever have/generate out of sequence WAL files?
For instance, 0001020C00A2, 0001020C00A3,
0001020C00A5 and so on, missing 0001020C00A4.
Manual/Accidental deletion of the WAL files can happes, but are there
any other extreme
