On Fri, 2025-07-25 at 10:23 +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> Some patches marked as "Waiting on Author" were not updated to "Needs
> Review" after they posted a new version, so I haven't returned all of
> them. For the ones that are still open, I’ve sent a private email to
> the respective authors. Let’s
On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 at 22:28, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> On 2025-Jul-24, Laurenz Albe wrote:
>
> > I just happened to look into https://commitfest.postgresql.org/52/
> > and saw plenty of "Active patches" there.
> >
> > I guess that's a consequence of the new rule established in [1].
>
> I don't kn
On Thu, 2025-07-24 at 18:58 +0200, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Jul-24, Laurenz Albe wrote:
>
> > I just happened to look into https://commitfest.postgresql.org/52/
> > and saw plenty of "Active patches" there.
>
> I *think* we should close the Waiting-on-author ones as Returned with
> Feedbac
On 2025-Jul-24, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> I just happened to look into https://commitfest.postgresql.org/52/
> and saw plenty of "Active patches" there.
>
> I guess that's a consequence of the new rule established in [1].
I don't know about the rest of it, but I moved all the entries in the
"Bug Fix
I just happened to look into https://commitfest.postgresql.org/52/
and saw plenty of "Active patches" there.
I guess that's a consequence of the new rule established in [1].
Are they supposed to stay like that? Should they be closed?
If yes, "Returned with Feedback"? Or some new state "Abandoned
