On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 07:25:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Here's a draft patch that converts all the built-in and information_schema
> SQL functions to new style, except for half a dozen that cannot be
> converted because they use polymorphic arguments.
This patch looks good.
> One thing I was
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 07:25:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> One thing I was wondering about, but did not pull the trigger on
> here, is whether to split off the function-related stuff in
> system_views.sql into a new file "system_functions.sql"
+1
--
Justin
[ moving this to a new thread so as not to confuse the cfbot ]
I wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> Is there anything else we should be doing along the eat your own dogfood
>> line that don't have these security implications?
> We can still convert the initdb-created SQL functions to new style,