Re: Desirability of client-side expressions in psql?

so 24. 11. 2018 v 22:03 odesílatel Corey Huinker napsal: > > >> >>psql> \if :i >= 5 >> >> >> > I think we're ok with that so long as none of the operators or values >> has a >> > \ in it. >> > What barriers do you see to re-using the pgbench grammar? >> >> The pgbench expression grammar

Re: Desirability of client-side expressions in psql?

> > >>psql> \if :i >= 5 > >> > > I think we're ok with that so long as none of the operators or values > has a > > \ in it. > > What barriers do you see to re-using the pgbench grammar? > > The pgbench expression grammar mimics SQL expression grammar, > on integers, floats, booleans & NULL. >

Re: Desirability of client-side expressions in psql?

Hello Corey, psql> \if :i >= 5 I think we're ok with that so long as none of the operators or values has a \ in it. What barriers do you see to re-using the pgbench grammar? The pgbench expression grammar mimics SQL expression grammar, on integers, floats, booleans & NULL. I'm unsure

Re: Desirability of client-side expressions in psql?

> > >psql> \if :i >= 5 > > I think we're ok with that so long as none of the operators or values has a \ in it. What barriers do you see to re-using the pgbench grammar?

Re: Desirability of client-side expressions in psql?

Hello Stephen, [...] So, I tend to agree w/ Andrew that while this is a good topic to have on -hackers, it shouldn't be a CF entry. I wouldn't draw any conclusions from Andrew closing it out as "not appropriate for CF". Sure. As I had no committer feedback on the discussion for 3 months,

Re: Desirability of client-side expressions in psql?

Hello Andrew, I set it to Rejected. This seems like a misuse of the CF process, which is about discussing actual patches. Somehow. As I have not received feedback from committers about the desirability of the feature, I interpret that as "the feature is not desirable", and I will not

Re: Desirability of client-side expressions in psql?

On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 1:29 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote: >> >> I do not mind spending some time for elegance, but I mind spending time for >> nothing. >> >> I hope some committers will also express their views about the feature. >> > > There's

Re: Desirability of client-side expressions in psql?

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 1:29 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote: > > I do not mind spending some time for elegance, but I mind spending time for > nothing. > > I hope some committers will also express their views about the feature. > There's a commitfest entry for this but no patch. So I am marking this as

Re: Desirability of client-side expressions in psql?

2018-06-24 16:13 GMT+02:00 Fabien COELHO : > > Hello Pavel, > > This is a discussion without actual patch intended for pg12, to be added to CF 2018-09. The expected end result is either "returned with feedback", meaning proceed to send some big patch(es), or "rejected", meaning the

Re: Desirability of client-side expressions in psql?

Hello Pavel, This is a discussion without actual patch intended for pg12, to be added to CF 2018-09. The expected end result is either "returned with feedback", meaning proceed to send some big patch(es), or "rejected", meaning the project does not want this, no point in submitting something.

Re: Desirability of client-side expressions in psql?

2018-03-03 11:35 GMT+01:00 Fabien COELHO : > > Hello devs, > > This is a discussion without actual patch intended for pg12, to be added > to CF 2018-09. The expected end result is either "returned with feedback", > meaning proceed to send some big patch(es), or "rejected",

Desirability of client-side expressions in psql?

Hello devs, This is a discussion without actual patch intended for pg12, to be added to CF 2018-09. The expected end result is either "returned with feedback", meaning proceed to send some big patch(es), or "rejected", meaning the project does not want this, no point in submitting something.