On 2019-06-20 18:33, Andres Freund wrote:
> I wonder if we need to split the timeout into two: One value for
> postmaster to acknowledge the action, one for that action to
> complete. It seems to me that that'd be useful for all of starting,
> restarting and stopping.
>
> I think we have all the n
Hi,
Right now using -w for shutting down clusters with a bit bigger shared
buffers will very frequently fail, because the shutdown checkpoint takes
much longer than 60s. Obviously that can be addressed by manually
setting PGCTLTIMEOUT to something higher, but forcing many users to do
that doesn't
