On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:42 PM David Rowley wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 19:05, Peter Smith wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 3:11 PM David Rowley wrote:
> > > If you want to do this, what's the reason to limit it to just this one
> > > page of the docs?
> >
> > Yeah, I had a vested
Peter Smith writes:
> Yeah, I had a vested interest in this one place because I've been
> reviewing the other thread [1] that was mentioned above. If that other
> thread chooses "true|false" then putting "true|false" adjacent to
> another "on|off" will look silly. But if that other thread adopts
On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 19:05, Peter Smith wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 3:11 PM David Rowley wrote:
> > If you want to do this, what's the reason to limit it to just this one
> > page of the docs?
>
> Yeah, I had a vested interest in this one place because I've been
> reviewing the other
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 3:11 PM David Rowley wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 12:29, Peter Smith wrote:
> > There are lots of subscription options listed on the CREATE
> > SUBSCRIPTION page [1].
> >
> > Although these boolean options are capable of accepting different
> > values like "1|0",
On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 12:29, Peter Smith wrote:
> There are lots of subscription options listed on the CREATE
> SUBSCRIPTION page [1].
>
> Although these boolean options are capable of accepting different
> values like "1|0", "on|off", "true|false", here they are all described
> only using
Hi hackers,
There are lots of subscription options listed on the CREATE
SUBSCRIPTION page [1].
Although these boolean options are capable of accepting different
values like "1|0", "on|off", "true|false", here they are all described
only using values "true|false".
~
IMO this consistent way of
