Re: Extending range type operators to cope with elements

On 3/4/21 6:11 AM, Ibrar Ahmed wrote: This patch set no longer applies. http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_32_2747.log Can we get a rebase? I am marking the patch "Waiting on Author" This patch needs updates and a rebase and there has been no new

Re: Extending range type operators to cope with elements

On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 1:36 AM Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:08:19PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > + > > + > > +anyelement > anyrange > > +boolean > > + > > + > > +Is the element strictly right of the element?

Re: Extending range type operators to cope with elements

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:08:19PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote: > Hi, > > + > + > +anyelement > anyrange > +boolean > + > + > +Is the element strictly right of the element? > + should say "of the range" ? > +++

Re: Extending range type operators to cope with elements

On 31.10.2020 01:08, Tomas Vondra wrote: Hi, On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 04:01:27PM +, Georgios Kokolatos wrote: Hi, thank you for your contribution. I did notice that the cfbot [1] is failing for this patch. Please try to address the issues if you can for the upcoming commitfest. I took

Re: Extending range type operators to cope with elements

Hi, On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 04:01:27PM +, Georgios Kokolatos wrote: Hi, thank you for your contribution. I did notice that the cfbot [1] is failing for this patch. Please try to address the issues if you can for the upcoming commitfest. I took a look at the patch today - the regression

Re: Extending range type operators to cope with elements

Hi, thank you for your contribution. I did notice that the cfbot [1] is failing for this patch. Please try to address the issues if you can for the upcoming commitfest. Cheers, //Georgios [1] http://cfbot.cputube.org/esteban-zimanyi.html

Re: Fwd: Extending range type operators to cope with elements

Esteban Zimanyi writes: > After a long time (as you can imagine, this year everything has been upside > down ...), you will find enclosed the patch for extending the range > operators so they can cope with range element and element range > in addition to the existing range range. Cool.

Re: Fwd: Extending range type operators to cope with elements

Dear all After a long time (as you can imagine, this year everything has been upside down ...), you will find enclosed the patch for extending the range operators so they can cope with range element and element range in addition to the existing range range. Best regards Esteban

Re: Fwd: Extending range type operators to cope with elements

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:18 AM David Fetter wrote: > It's not done by pull request at this time. Instead, it is done by sending > patches to this mailing list. Dear all You will find enclosed the patch that extends the range type operators so they cope with elements. Any comments most

Re: Fwd: Extending range type operators to cope with elements

On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 04:30:52PM +0200, Esteban Zimanyi wrote: > > So yes, I've had a need for those operators in the past. What I don't > know is whether adding these functions will be worth the catalog clutter. > > The operators are tested and running within MobilityDB. It concerns lines >

Re: Extending range type operators to cope with elements

> > > So yes, I've had a need for those operators in the past. What I don't know > is whether adding these functions will be worth the catalog clutter. > The operators are tested and running within MobilityDB. It concerns lines 231-657 for the C code in file

Fwd: Extending range type operators to cope with elements

> So yes, I've had a need for those operators in the past. What I don't know is whether adding these functions will be worth the catalog clutter. The operators are tested and running within MobilityDB. It concerns lines 231-657 for the C code in file

Re: Extending range type operators to cope with elements

> > > >- @> contains range/element > >- <@ element/range is contained by > I'm not a heavy user or range types, so I can't really judge how useful > that is in practice, but it seems like a fairly natural extension of the > existing operators. I mean, if I understand it correctly, the proposed >

Re: Extending range type operators to cope with elements

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 08:50:18AM +0200, Esteban Zimanyi wrote: Dear all While developing MobilityDB we needed to extend the range type operators so they cope with elements. In the same way that currently the range types support both - @> contains range/element - <@ element/range is contained

Extending range type operators to cope with elements

Dear all While developing MobilityDB we needed to extend the range type operators so they cope with elements. In the same way that currently the range types support both - @> contains range/element - <@ element/range is contained by we extended the left (<<), overleft (&<), right (>>), and