Em dom., 14 de abr. de 2024 às 21:29, Michael Paquier
escreveu:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 10:40:35AM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > This sounds a little confusing to me.
> > Is the project policy to *tolerate* dereferencing NULL pointers?
> > If this is the case, no problem, using Assert would
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 12:46 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> I don't much like adding extra runtime checks for "can't happen"
> scenarios either. Assertions would be more clear, but in this case the
> code would just segfault trying to dereference the NULL pointer, which
> is fine for a "can't
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 10:40:35AM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> This sounds a little confusing to me.
> Is the project policy to *tolerate* dereferencing NULL pointers?
> If this is the case, no problem, using Assert would serve the purpose of
> protecting against these errors well.
In most
Em sáb., 13 de abr. de 2024 às 04:16, Heikki Linnakangas
escreveu:
> On 11/04/2024 16:37, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > Em qui., 11 de abr. de 2024 às 09:54, Heikki Linnakangas
> > mailto:hlinn...@iki.fi>> escreveu:
> >
> > On 11/04/2024 15:03, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > > Em qua., 10 de abr.
On 11/04/2024 16:37, Ranier Vilela wrote:
Em qui., 11 de abr. de 2024 às 09:54, Heikki Linnakangas
mailto:hlinn...@iki.fi>> escreveu:
On 11/04/2024 15:03, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Em qua., 10 de abr. de 2024 às 18:28, Heikki Linnakangas
> mailto:hlinn...@iki.fi>
Em qui., 11 de abr. de 2024 às 09:54, Heikki Linnakangas
escreveu:
> On 11/04/2024 15:03, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > Em qua., 10 de abr. de 2024 às 18:28, Heikki Linnakangas
> > mailto:hlinn...@iki.fi>> escreveu:
> >
> > On 10/04/2024 21:07, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> >
On 11/04/2024 15:03, Ranier Vilela wrote:
Em qua., 10 de abr. de 2024 às 18:28, Heikki Linnakangas
mailto:hlinn...@iki.fi>> escreveu:
On 10/04/2024 21:07, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Per Coverity.
>
> The function ReorderBufferTXNByXid,
> can return NULL
Em qua., 10 de abr. de 2024 às 18:28, Heikki Linnakangas
escreveu:
> On 10/04/2024 21:07, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Per Coverity.
> >
> > The function ReorderBufferTXNByXid,
> > can return NULL when the parameter *create* is false.
> >
> > In the functions ReorderBufferSetBaseSnapshot
On 10/04/2024 21:07, Ranier Vilela wrote:
Hi,
Per Coverity.
The function ReorderBufferTXNByXid,
can return NULL when the parameter *create* is false.
In the functions ReorderBufferSetBaseSnapshot
and ReorderBufferXidHasBaseSnapshot,
the second call to ReorderBufferTXNByXid,
pass false to
Hi,
Per Coverity.
The function ReorderBufferTXNByXid,
can return NULL when the parameter *create* is false.
In the functions ReorderBufferSetBaseSnapshot
and ReorderBufferXidHasBaseSnapshot,
the second call to ReorderBufferTXNByXid,
pass false to *create* argument.
In the function
10 matches
Mail list logo