Esteban Zimanyi writes:
> After a long time (as you can imagine, this year everything has been upside
> down ...), you will find enclosed the patch for extending the range
> operators so they can cope with range element and element range
> in addition to the existing range range.
Cool.
Dear all
After a long time (as you can imagine, this year everything has been upside
down ...), you will find enclosed the patch for extending the range
operators so they can cope with range element and element range
in addition to the existing range range.
Best regards
Esteban
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:18 AM David Fetter wrote:
> It's not done by pull request at this time. Instead, it is done by sending
> patches to this mailing list.
Dear all
You will find enclosed the patch that extends the range type operators so
they cope with elements.
Any comments most
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 04:30:52PM +0200, Esteban Zimanyi wrote:
> > So yes, I've had a need for those operators in the past. What I don't
> know is whether adding these functions will be worth the catalog clutter.
>
> The operators are tested and running within MobilityDB. It concerns lines
>
> So yes, I've had a need for those operators in the past. What I don't
know is whether adding these functions will be worth the catalog clutter.
The operators are tested and running within MobilityDB. It concerns lines
231-657 for the C code in file
