Hi,
> > Thanks, pushed after correcting a couple typos.
>
> Thanks!
I noticed that ec99d6e9c87a introduced a slight typo:
s/if there is not room/if there is no room
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 19:06, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
> On 7/7/23 18:34, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 00:14, Tomas Vondra
> > wrote:
> >> The original text was really about on/off, and I'm not quite sure the
> >> part about "exception" makes this very clear.
> >
> > Agreed
On 7/7/23 18:34, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 00:14, Tomas Vondra
> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, README.HOT should have been updated, and I see no reason not to
>> backpatch this to v16. Barring objections, I'll do that tomorrow.
>>
>> I have two suggesting regarding the README.HOT
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 00:14, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
> Yeah, README.HOT should have been updated, and I see no reason not to
> backpatch this to v16. Barring objections, I'll do that tomorrow.
>
> I have two suggesting regarding the README.HOT changes:
>
> 1) I'm not entirely sure it's very clear wh
Yeah, README.HOT should have been updated, and I see no reason not to
backpatch this to v16. Barring objections, I'll do that tomorrow.
I have two suggesting regarding the README.HOT changes:
1) I'm not entirely sure it's very clear what "referential integrity of
indexes across tuple updates" act
Hi,
With PG16's 19d8e230, we got rid of BRIN's blocking of HOT updates,
but I just realized that we failed to update the README.HOT document
with this new exception for summarizing indexes.
Attached a patch that updates that document, detailing the related rationale.
I'm not sure if such interna
