On 22.12.2017 16:21, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
On 2017-12-22 16:07:23 +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
While my experiments with pthreads version of Postgres I find out that I can
not create more than 100k backends even at the system with 4Tb of RAM.
I don't think this is a problem we need t
On 22.12.2017 16:13, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Konstantin Knizhnik
mailto:k.knizh...@postgrespro.ru>> wrote:
While my experiments with pthreads version of Postgres I find out
that I can not create more than 100k backends even at the system
with 4Tb
Hi,
On 2017-12-22 16:07:23 +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> While my experiments with pthreads version of Postgres I find out that I can
> not create more than 100k backends even at the system with 4Tb of RAM.
I don't think this is a problem we need to address at this point. Would
you care to
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Konstantin Knizhnik <
k.knizh...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> While my experiments with pthreads version of Postgres I find out that I
> can not create more than 100k backends even at the system with 4Tb of RAM.
> I do not want to discuss now the idea of creating so l
While my experiments with pthreads version of Postgres I find out that I
can not create more than 100k backends even at the system with 4Tb of RAM.
I do not want to discuss now the idea of creating so large number of
backends - yes, most of the real production systems are using pgbouncer
or simi
