On 2018-Oct-25, David Fetter wrote:
> > I didn't intend to add anything else later. I don't think we have
> > any variables that zero padding would be that useful for, but maybe
> > someone might want to zero pad their pids or xids... ?
>
> They might, so I'll either put in a comment where that w
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 01:00:08PM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> On 25 October 2018 at 11:25, David Fetter wrote:
> > Digging a teensy bit deeper, I noticed that there's already a
> > "padding" (space padding, if I understand correctly) system for parts
> > of the log_line_prefix specification incl
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 01:00:08PM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> On 25 October 2018 at 11:25, David Fetter wrote:
>> Strangely, there were no tests that came with that either. David, did
>> you mean to expand it past space padding, or...?
>
> Unsure what infrastructure existed then for testing th
On 25 October 2018 at 11:25, David Fetter wrote:
> Digging a teensy bit deeper, I noticed that there's already a
> "padding" (space padding, if I understand correctly) system for parts
> of the log_line_prefix specification including %m. Did we get painted
> into a corner here back in 9.4, when th
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > On 2018-Oct-24, David Fetter wrote:
> >> For another, having separate letter rather than number modifiers as
> >> printf("%03d") does, is just lousy API design.
>
> > I don't think the API is lousy as all that,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 11:10:02AM +0100, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter writes:
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 08:00:24AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:51 AM David Fetter wrote:
> >>> Per gripes I've been hearing with increasing frequency, please find
> >>> attached a pa
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> On 2018-Oct-24, David Fetter wrote:
>> For another, having separate letter rather than number modifiers as
>> printf("%03d") does, is just lousy API design.
> I don't think the API is lousy as all that, but a further improvement to
> allow a precision specifier might be a
On 2018-Oct-24, David Fetter wrote:
> For another, having separate letter rather than number modifiers as
> printf("%03d") does, is just lousy API design.
I don't think the API is lousy as all that, but a further improvement to
allow a precision specifier might be a worthy feature addition -- say
David Fetter writes:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 08:00:24AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:51 AM David Fetter wrote:
>>> Per gripes I've been hearing with increasing frequency, please find
>>> attached a patch that implements $Subject. It's microsecond resolution
>>> becaus
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 08:46:47AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:11:18AM +0200, David Fetter wrote:
> > That's an interesting point. pgbadger is the only one I recall using
> > that's still maintained. Which others would it be useful to test?
>
> There could be privat
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:11:18AM +0200, David Fetter wrote:
> That's an interesting point. pgbadger is the only one I recall using
> that's still maintained. Which others would it be useful to test?
There could be private solutions as well. My take is that we should use
separate letters and no
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:14:50PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Oct-23, David Fetter wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 08:00:24AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:51 AM David Fetter wrote:
> > > > Per gripes I've been hearing with increasing frequency, pleas
On 2018-Oct-23, David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 08:00:24AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:51 AM David Fetter wrote:
> > > Per gripes I've been hearing with increasing frequency, please find
> > > attached a patch that implements $Subject. It's microsecond r
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 08:00:24AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:51 AM David Fetter wrote:
> > Per gripes I've been hearing with increasing frequency, please find
> > attached a patch that implements $Subject. It's microsecond resolution
> > because at least at the moment,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:51 AM David Fetter wrote:
> Per gripes I've been hearing with increasing frequency, please find
> attached a patch that implements $Subject. It's microsecond resolution
> because at least at the moment, nanosecond resolution doesn't appear
> to be helpful in this context.
Folks,
Per gripes I've been hearing with increasing frequency, please find
attached a patch that implements $Subject. It's microsecond resolution
because at least at the moment, nanosecond resolution doesn't appear
to be helpful in this context.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
P
16 matches
Mail list logo
