Hi~
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 12:50 AM Jingtang Zhang
> wrote:
>> Back to v17, commit 21d9c3ee gave SMgrRelation a well-defined lifetime, and
>> smgrclose nolonger removes SMgrRelation object from the hashtable, leaving
>> the work to smgrdestroyall. But I find a place that relies on the removin
Hi~
Thanks for looking.
> DropRelationFiles() is also called by FinishPreparedTransaction(). At
> first I thought that might be a problem too, but looking a bit more
> closely and trying it out... if a prepared transaction dropped a
> table, then it called RelationDropStorage(), RelationCloseSmg
On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 12:50 AM Jingtang Zhang wrote:
> Back to v17, commit 21d9c3ee gave SMgrRelation a well-defined lifetime, and
> smgrclose nolonger removes SMgrRelation object from the hashtable, leaving
> the work to smgrdestroyall. But I find a place that relies on the removing
> behavior
Hi~ hackers
Back to v17, commit 21d9c3ee gave SMgrRelation a well-defined lifetime, and
smgrclose nolonger removes SMgrRelation object from the hashtable, leaving
the work to smgrdestroyall. But I find a place that relies on the removing
behavior previously, but is still calling smgrclose.
Startu
