> On 24 Feb 2023, at 08:40, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Mmm. The following changes of e9960732a9 seem like reverting the
> previous commit 35ce24c333...
Fixed in 94851e4b90, thanks for the report!
--
Daniel Gustafsson
At Fri, 24 Feb 2023 16:31:27 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote in
> I noticed that the commit e9960732a9 introduced the following message.
>
> + if (EndCompressFileHandle(ctx->dataFH) != 0)
> + pg_fatal("could not close blob data file: %m");
>
> It seems that we have removed
> On 24 Feb 2023, at 08:31, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Shouldn't we use "large object" instead of "blob" in the message?
Nice catch, it should be "large object" as per the linked discussion. There
are also a few more like:
- if (cfclose(ctx->LOsTocFH) != 0)
- pg_fatal("coul
I noticed that the commit e9960732a9 introduced the following message.
+ if (EndCompressFileHandle(ctx->dataFH) != 0)
+ pg_fatal("could not close blob data file: %m");
It seems that we have removed the terminology "blob(s)" from
user-facing messages by the commit 35ce24c333 (d