> I'm sorry for not having read (and not reading) the other thread yet,
> but what was the reason we couldn't store that oid in a column in the
> pg_s_p_vacuum-view?
> Could you summarize the other solutions that were considered for this issue?
Thanks for your feedback!
The reason we cannot sti
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 16:45, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [1] is a ready-for-committer enhancement to pg_stat_progress_vacuum which
> exposes
> the total number of indexes to vacuum and how many indexes have been vacuumed
> in
> the current vacuum cycle.
>
> To even further improve vis
Hi,
[1] is a ready-for-committer enhancement to pg_stat_progress_vacuum which
exposes
the total number of indexes to vacuum and how many indexes have been vacuumed in
the current vacuum cycle.
To even further improve visibility into index vacuuming, it would be beneficial
to have a
function cal
