Glyn Astill writes:
> I guess the main question is; does anybody care about builds on a 20 year old
> netbsd/mipsel dinosaur? I noticed there are now mips64el and mips64eb
> build-farm members.
I tend to think that variety in the buildfarm is intrinsically a good
thing. I'd rather see you
>> On Saturday, 26 January 2019, 16:00:24 GMT, Tom Lane
wrote: >>
>> I'm thinking we should regretfully retire opossum, unless there's
>> a software update available for it that fixes this bug.
I'm happy to update opossum to see if the issue goes away; likewise I'm just as
happy to retire it
> "Tom" == Tom Lane writes:
Tom> The reason that it's reappeared is the refactoring we've done
Tom> recently around snprintf: float4out is now taking its float4
Tom> argument and widening it to double to pass to strtod, which is
Tom> where the checks for Inf/NaN happen.
[...]
Tom> to
I see that opossum's owner just resurrected it after a period of being
MIA ... and it's failing a few regression tests with symptoms like
this:
SELECT 'NaN'::float4;
- float4
-
-NaN
+ float4
+--
+ Infinity
(1 row)
I have no doubt that this is caused by the same platform
