"Yu Shi (Fujitsu)" writes:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 6:26 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>> I do see a docs change that I think would be worth making: get
>> rid of the explicit mention of it in create_subscription.sgml
>> in favor of using that view.
> I agree and I tried to modify the query to use the view.
On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 7:35 AM Yu Shi (Fujitsu) wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 6:26 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > I do see a docs change that I think would be worth making: get
> > rid of the explicit mention of it in create_subscription.sgml
> > in favor of using that view.
> >
>
> I agree and I t
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 6:26 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I do see a docs change that I think would be worth making: get
> rid of the explicit mention of it in create_subscription.sgml
> in favor of using that view.
>
I agree and I tried to modify the query to use the view.
Please see the attached patch
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 9:26 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Peter Smith writes:
> > While reviewing another thread [1] I could not find the function
> > 'pg_get_publication_tables' described anywhere in the PG
> > documentation.
> > Should it be mentioned somewhere like the "System Catalog Information
>
Peter Smith writes:
> While reviewing another thread [1] I could not find the function
> 'pg_get_publication_tables' described anywhere in the PG
> documentation.
> Should it be mentioned somewhere like the "System Catalog Information
> Functions" table [2], or was this one deliberately omitted fo
Hi hackers,
While reviewing another thread [1] I could not find the function
'pg_get_publication_tables' described anywhere in the PG
documentation.
Should it be mentioned somewhere like the "System Catalog Information
Functions" table [2], or was this one deliberately omitted for some
reason?
T