Hi,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 11:28:43PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 11/17/21 15:45, Thomas wrote:
> > Thank you for the feedback and sorry for the oversight. I fixed the bug
> > and attached a new version of the patch.
> >
> > Kind Regards, Thomas
> >
> > Am Mi., 17. Nov. 2021 um 15:03 Uhr
On 11/17/21 15:45, Thomas wrote:
Thank you for the feedback and sorry for the oversight. I fixed the bug
and attached a new version of the patch.
Kind Regards, Thomas
Am Mi., 17. Nov. 2021 um 15:03 Uhr schrieb Daniel Gustafsson
mailto:dan...@yesql.se>>:
This patch fails to compile due
Thank you for the feedback and sorry for the oversight. I fixed the bug and
attached a new version of the patch.
Kind Regards, Thomas
Am Mi., 17. Nov. 2021 um 15:03 Uhr schrieb Daniel Gustafsson <
dan...@yesql.se>:
> This patch fails to compile due to an incorrect function name in an
>
This patch fails to compile due to an incorrect function name in an assertion:
nodeMergejoin.c:297:9: warning: implicit declaration of function 'list_legth'
is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
Assert(list_legth(node->rangeclause) < 3);
^
--
Daniel Gustafsson
Dear all,
thanks for the feedback!
We had a closer look at the previous patches and the CustomScan
infrastructure.
Compared to the previous patch, we do not (directly) focus on joins
with the overlap (&&) condition in this patch. Instead we consider
joins with containment (@>) between a range
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 04:27:54PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 07:14:32PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> >
>> > I'll start with the reason I set the work down before: it did not work
>> > well with multiple join keys. That might be fine, but I also started
>> > thinking
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 07:14:32PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 15:09 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> > It shouldn't be a blocker for you, but just so you're aware, there
> > was
> > a previous proposal for this in [1] and a patch in [2]. I've include
> > Jeff here just so he's
On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 15:09 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> It shouldn't be a blocker for you, but just so you're aware, there
> was
> a previous proposal for this in [1] and a patch in [2]. I've include
> Jeff here just so he's aware of this. Jeff may wish to state his
> intentions with his own
Thank you for the feedback.
I removed the redundant comments from the patch and added this thread to
the July CF [1].
Best Regards,
Thomas Mannhart
[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/33/3160/
Am Do., 10. Juni 2021 um 05:10 Uhr schrieb David Rowley <
dgrowle...@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, 10 Jun
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 03:05, Thomas wrote:
> We have implemented the Range Merge Join algorithm by extending the
> existing Merge Join to also support range conditions, i.e., BETWEEN-AND
> or @> (containment for range types).
It shouldn't be a blocker for you, but just so you're aware, there
10 matches
Mail list logo
