I am not actively working on this now, but I'll come back to it for
PG12 if you or Lukas don't beat me to it, and I'll help/test/review if
I you do. It seems there is plenty of demand for the feature and I'll
be very happy to see it.
Good to know, thanks!
I'd argue that it might be better to
Hi Dmitry,
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Dmitry Ivanov wrote:
> Is anybody still working on this? Are there any plans to add this to
> commitfest?
I am not actively working on this now, but I'll come back to it for
PG12 if you or Lukas don't beat me to it, and I'll
Hi,
Is anybody still working on this? Are there any plans to add this to
commitfest?
I'd like to add planning time to auto_explain, and it turns out that
this patch is somewhat relevant to that feature.
The current approach here is to set planning_time in PlannedStmt via
planner_hook,
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 8:04 AM, Lukas Fittl wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> > Unfortunately I'm not going to have bandwidth to figure this out
>> > during this commitfest due to other priorities so I'm going to call
>> > this
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately I'm not going to have bandwidth to figure this out
> > during this commitfest due to other priorities so I'm going to call
> > this "returned with feedback".
>
> OK. There's still time to get it done in the
Thomas Munro writes:
> One problem is that pgss_planner_hook doesn't have the source query
> text. That problem could be solved by adding a query_string argument
> to the planner hook function type and also planner(),
> standard_planner(), pg_plan_query(),
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:14 AM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What we could/should do instead, I think, is have pgss_planner_hook
>> make its own pgss_store() call to log the planning time results
>>
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Haribabu Kommi writes:
>>> I checked the latest patch and it is working fine and I don't have any
>>> further comments. Marked the patch as "ready for committer".
>
>> I started to look
I wrote:
> Haribabu Kommi writes:
>> I checked the latest patch and it is working fine and I don't have any
>> further comments. Marked the patch as "ready for committer".
> I started to look at this patch,
... looking further, I'm really seriously unhappy about this
Haribabu Kommi writes:
> I checked the latest patch and it is working fine and I don't have any
> further comments. Marked the patch as "ready for committer".
I started to look at this patch, and I'm not entirely convinced whether
it is a good thing for the planner_hook
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Thomas Munro <
thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Haribabu Kommi
> wrote:
>
> > +OUT plans int8,
> >
> > Addition of this column is good to find out how many time the plan is
> > generated
> >
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> I have often wanted $SUBJECT and was happy to find that Fujii-san had
> posted a patch five years ago[1]. The reception then seemed positive.
> So here is a refurbished and (hopefully) improved
12 matches
Mail list logo