And now it also passes tests.
Still learning about the git way of generating PostgreSQL patches,
that's why there are two separate ones
On Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 4:30 PM Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> Managed to send wrong patch earlier, this one actually compiles
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 1:48 PM Hannu
Managed to send wrong patch earlier, this one actually compiles
On Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 1:48 PM Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> Here is a rebased patch
>
> this time I did not indent the part under
> if(SessionReplicationRole != SESSION_REPLICATION_ROLE_REPLICA)
> {
> ... (
> }
>
> so it is immediately o
Here is a rebased patch
this time I did not indent the part under
if(SessionReplicationRole != SESSION_REPLICATION_ROLE_REPLICA)
{
... (
}
so it is immediately obviuos from the patch what is added.
I can add the indent later, or just let pg_ident take care of this in due time
On Sat, May 24, 20
I would also argue for treating this as a bug and back-porting to all
supported versions - a quick look at v13 seems to confirm that the
wrapped code has not changed at least since then.
I don't think we can claim the current state is Working As Intended
unless someone stands up and says they real
