On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 11:29, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> No, that's not acceptable. CREATE OR REPLACE should always produce
> exactly the same final state of the object, but in this case we cannot
> change the underlying function if the operator already exists.
It sounds like this patch isn't the direct
=?UTF-8?B?U3ZldGxhbmEgRGVyZXZ5YW5rbw==?= writes:
> It seems useful to have [OR REPLACE] option in CREATE OPERATOR statement, as
> in CREATE FUNCTION. This option may be good for writing extension update
> scripts, to avoid errors with re-creating the same operator.
No, that's not acceptable. C
