On 28.08.24 12:04, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
Hi,
On 04.10.23 16:37, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 03.10.23 13:28, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
While examining the code for similar places I noticed that the
following functions can also be const'ified:
- XLogRegisterData (?)
I don't think this
Hi,
> On 04.10.23 16:37, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 03.10.23 13:28, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> >> While examining the code for similar places I noticed that the
> >> following functions can also be const'ified:
>
> >> - XLogRegisterData (?)
> >
> > I don't think this would work, at least wit
On 9/26/23 06:34, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 09.09.23 21:03, David Steele wrote:
On 9/1/23 11:39, David Steele wrote:
Hackers,
I noticed that there was a mismatch between the const qualifiers for
excludeDirContents in src/backend/backup/backup/basebackup.c and
src/bin/pg_rewind/file_map.c an
On 09.09.23 21:03, David Steele wrote:
On 9/1/23 11:39, David Steele wrote:
Hackers,
I noticed that there was a mismatch between the const qualifiers for
excludeDirContents in src/backend/backup/backup/basebackup.c and
src/bin/pg_rewind/file_map.c and that led me to use ^static
const.*\*.*=
On 9/1/23 11:39, David Steele wrote:
Hackers,
I noticed that there was a mismatch between the const qualifiers for
excludeDirContents in src/backend/backup/backup/basebackup.c and
src/bin/pg_rewind/file_map.c and that led me to use ^static const.*\*.*=
to do a quick search for similar cases.
On 2019-10-29 21:11, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2019-10-29 16:48:24 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 2019-10-28 14:05, Robert Haas wrote:
Just out of curiosity, what is the motivation for this?
I don't remember. :-)
I had this code lying around from earlier "adventures in const", probably
rela
On 2019-10-29 16:48:24 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-10-28 14:05, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Just out of curiosity, what is the motivation for this?
>
> I don't remember. :-)
>
> I had this code lying around from earlier "adventures in const", probably
> related to unconstify() and that wo
On 2019-10-28 14:05, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 5:01 AM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
This patch adds const qualifiers to internal range type APIs. It
doesn't require any new casts or remove any old ones.
Just out of curiosity, what is the motivation for this?
I don't remember. :
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 5:01 AM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> This patch adds const qualifiers to internal range type APIs. It
> doesn't require any new casts or remove any old ones.
Just out of curiosity, what is the motivation for this?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Th
