On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 8:49 AM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 7:37 PM Ajin Cherian wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 2:19 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > >
> > > In the commit message, you mentioned: "Performance tests show it's
> > > faster than the COPY (SELECT ...) TO vari
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 7:37 PM Ajin Cherian wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 2:19 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > In the commit message, you mentioned: "Performance tests show it's
> > faster than the COPY (SELECT ...) TO variant as it avoids the
> > overheads of query processing and sending res
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 2:19 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> In the commit message, you mentioned: "Performance tests show it's
> faster than the COPY (SELECT ...) TO variant as it avoids the
> overheads of query processing and sending results to the COPY TO
> command.". Can you share the performance da
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 8:39 AM Ajin Cherian wrote:
>
> After patch [1] was committed, the COPY TO command is now supported
> for partitioned tables. This change updates the tablesync logic to use
> COPY TO for partitioned tables as well.
>
In the commit message, you mentioned: "Performance tests
