Le 01/07/2024 à 10:07, Daniel Gustafsson a écrit :
On 28 Jun 2024, at 09:06, Philippe BEAUDOIN wrote:
So just looking in public repo covers probably less than 1% of the code.
However, this may give a first idea, especialy if a feature use is already
detected.
Searching for anything on Github
> On 28 Jun 2024, at 09:06, Philippe BEAUDOIN wrote:
> So just looking in public repo covers probably less than 1% of the code.
> However, this may give a first idea, especialy if a feature use is already
> detected.
Searching for anything on Github is essentially a dead end since it reports s
Le 27/06/2024 à 10:38, Matthias van de Meent a écrit :
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024, 07:34 Philippe BEAUDOIN, wrote:
Hi,
I have just tested PG17 beta1 with the E-Maj solution I maintain. The
only issue I found is the removal of the adminpack contrib.
In the emaj extension, which is the heart of the so
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024, 07:34 Philippe BEAUDOIN, wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have just tested PG17 beta1 with the E-Maj solution I maintain. The
> only issue I found is the removal of the adminpack contrib.
>
> In the emaj extension, which is the heart of the solution, and which is
> written in plpgsql, the
I agree that removing adminpack was a bit of a surprise for me as
well. At first I assumed that it was just moved into the core to
accompany the file and directory *reading* functions, until I found
the release notes mentioning that now one of the users of adminpack
does not need it and so it is dr
