On 2/14/18 13:56, Andres Freund wrote:
> With your example I can reliably trigger the issue if I shut down the
> server while the query is running:
OK, that way I can see it too. Fix pushed.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remot
On 2018-02-12 15:43:49 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2/6/18 12:06, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2018-02-06 12:01:08 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> On 2/1/18 20:35, Andres Freund wrote:
> >>> On February 1, 2018 11:13:06 PM GMT+01:00, Peter Eisentraut
> >>> wrote:
> Here is a patch t
On 2/6/18 12:06, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-02-06 12:01:08 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 2/1/18 20:35, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> On February 1, 2018 11:13:06 PM GMT+01:00, Peter Eisentraut
>>> wrote:
Here is a patch to implement that idea. Do you have a way to test it
repeatedl
On 2018-02-06 12:01:08 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2/1/18 20:35, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On February 1, 2018 11:13:06 PM GMT+01:00, Peter Eisentraut
> > wrote:
> >>Here is a patch to implement that idea. Do you have a way to test it
> >>repeatedly, or do you just randomly cancel queries?
On 2/1/18 20:35, Andres Freund wrote:
> On February 1, 2018 11:13:06 PM GMT+01:00, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
>>Here is a patch to implement that idea. Do you have a way to test it
>>repeatedly, or do you just randomly cancel queries?
>
> For me cancelling the long running parallel queries I tried
On February 1, 2018 11:13:06 PM GMT+01:00, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
>Here is a patch to implement that idea. Do you have a way to test it
>repeatedly, or do you just randomly cancel queries?
For me cancelling the long running parallel queries I tried reliably triggers
the issue. I encountered
On 1/27/18 22:45, Andres Freund wrote:
> I think the comment was bad, but the functionality pretty crucial. So I
> don't think
> In AtAbort_Portals(), remove the code that marks an active portal as
> failed. As the comment there already predicted, this doesn't work if
> the running com
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi Peter (and others who mucked around with related code),
>
> While testing another patch I found that cancelling a parallel query on
> master segfaults the leader in an interesting manner:
...
> It's clearly not OK to recurse back into the
