Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>> On 23 Oct 2025, at 16:41, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> I don't remember the exact details (and an archive search is failing me) but
>> I seem to recall support for the Git protocol being removed a while back.
> This was just confirmed off-list..
Yeah, I also recall b
>On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 7:41 AM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 23 Oct 2025, at 01:17, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
>> The docs page mentioned in the first command needs to be fixed for sure.
> If the Git protocol is indeed unsupported we need something like the
attached
backpatched all the way.
LGTM
On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 7:59 AM Nathan Bossart wrote:
> LGTM
+1
--Jacob
On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 04:53:30PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> If the Git protocol is indeed unsupported we need something like the attached
>> backpatched all the way.
>
> ..so unless objected to this seems like an appropriate fix.
LGTM
--
nathan
> On 23 Oct 2025, at 16:41, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I don't remember the exact details (and an archive search is failing me) but
> I seem to recall support for the Git protocol being removed a while back.
This was just confirmed off-list..
>> The docs page mentioned in the first command need
> On 23 Oct 2025, at 01:17, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if it's expected because of some recent infrastructure changes,
> but cloning Postgres repo with the following commands fails.
I don't remember the exact details (and an archive search is failing me) but
I seem to recall support
