On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:42 PM, Amit Langote
wrote:
>> Another alternative, which I think might make more sense, is to make
>> use pd->key and pd->partdesc in preference to pd->reldesc->rd_partkey
>> and pd->reldesc->rd_partdesc. It seems to me that the idea of the
>> PartitionDispatch structur
On 2018/07/26 5:23, Robert Haas wrote:
> I noticed today that in the PartitionDispatch structure, the partdesc
> field is set but not used. So we could remove it. See attached
> pd-partdesc-remove.patch. If we want to go this route, I suggest
> doing a slightly more thorough removal and getting
