Hi!
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 12:13 AM David Steele wrote:
> There doesn't seem to be consensus on whether or not we want this patch.
> Peter has issues with the way it works and Andres [1] thinks it should
> be pushed to PG13 or possibly rejected.
>
> I'll push this to PG13 for now.
Sorry, I am ne
On 1/5/19 11:57 PM, Mitar wrote:
Having better updating of materialized views using incremental
approach would really benefit my use case as well. Then triggers being
added through my patch here on materialized view itself could
communicate those changes which were done to the client. If I
under
