> On 20 Mar 2024, at 15:28, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>> On 29 Feb 2024, at 20:58, Jacob Champion
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 2:54 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> I rank that as one of my better typos actually. Fixed though.
>>
>> LGTM!
>
> Thanks for review, and since Heikki m
> On 29 Feb 2024, at 20:58, Jacob Champion
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 2:54 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> I rank that as one of my better typos actually. Fixed though.
>
> LGTM!
Thanks for review, and since Heikki marked it ready for committer I assume that
counting as a +1 as well.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 2:54 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I rank that as one of my better typos actually. Fixed though.
LGTM!
Thanks,
--Jacob
> On 26 Feb 2024, at 19:56, Jacob Champion
> wrote:
>> + * SASL_FAILED: The exchance has failed and the connection should be
>
> s/exchance/exchange/
I rank that as one of my better typos actually. Fixed though.
>> - if (final && !done)
>> + if (final && !(status == SASL_FAILED || status == S
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 2:30 AM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> The attached two patches are smaller refactorings to the SASL exchange and
> init
> codepaths which are required for the OAuthbearer work [0]. Regardless of the
> future of that patchset, these refactorings are nice cleanups and can be
