Re: Tom Lane
> Yeah, seems quite bogus. It's harmless though, so I don't
> see a need to back-patch, do you?
Other than it being confusing, it doesn't hurt.
Christoph
Christoph Berg writes:
> Re: Tom Lane
>> Yeah, seems quite bogus. It's harmless though, so I don't
>> see a need to back-patch, do you?
> Other than it being confusing, it doesn't hurt.
OK, applied to master only.
regards, tom lane
Christoph Berg writes:
> pgxs.mk is cleaning up a file "regress.def" if PORTNAME=win, but the
> only reference to that file I could find is in the original commit
> from 1999 adding that "rm" rule (and several commits moving the rule
> around later).
> Given that the PORTNAME is wrong (should be
