On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:13:41AM -0400, David Steele wrote:
> +1. This schedule seems to have worked fine the last two years.
Sounds like a conclusion to me. I have created four new CFs for the
next development cycle then in the CF app.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 5/21/20 2:35 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
Hi all,
Normally $subject would have been discussed at the developer meeting
in Ottawa, but that's not going to happen per the current situation.
For the last couple of years, we have been using the same timeline for
for commit fests in a development c
Michael Paquier writes:
> Normally $subject would have been discussed at the developer meeting
> in Ottawa, but that's not going to happen per the current situation.
> For the last couple of years, we have been using the same timeline for
> for commit fests in a development cycle, so why not goin
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:36 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Normally $subject would have been discussed at the developer meeting
> in Ottawa, but that's not going to happen per the current situation.
>
> For the last couple of years, we have been using the same timeline for
> for commit
