Hi,
On 2025-07-10 09:52:45 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 03:46:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund writes:
> >> Seems like we should just remove TransactionIdIsActive()?
> >
> > +1. I wondered if any extensions might depend on it, but
> > could not find any t
On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 03:46:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
>> Seems like we should just remove TransactionIdIsActive()?
>
> +1. I wondered if any extensions might depend on it, but
> could not find any trace of that in Debian code search.
> And it's a sufficiently odd test
Andres Freund writes:
> Seems like we should just remove TransactionIdIsActive()?
+1. I wondered if any extensions might depend on it, but
could not find any trace of that in Debian code search.
And it's a sufficiently odd test (as noted in its comments)
that one could debate whether using it fo
