On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 10:21:54AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 01:19:41PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > I don't really have a preference. Bank lock is shorter but may be a bit
> > more
> > obscure, especially outside slru.c, so using "SLRU bank lock" could be
> > b
On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 01:19:41PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> I don't really have a preference. Bank lock is shorter but may be a bit more
> obscure, especially outside slru.c, so using "SLRU bank lock" could be better
> indeed.
Okay, I have used "SLRU bank lock" and backpatched that down to
On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 02:05:56PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:32:41AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > Note that the main comment of slru.c still has one paragraph that mentions
> > "bank control lock" consistently before switching to just "control lock" in
> > the
On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:32:41AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> Note that the main comment of slru.c still has one paragraph that mentions
> "bank control lock" consistently before switching to just "control lock" in
> the
> next paragraph. I'm assuming that it's ok in that context as it seems
