Re: anonymous unions (C11)

2025-10-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 23.09.25 16:17, Nathan Bossart wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 11:38:22AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: That said, I did go overboard here and converted all the struct/union combinations I could find, but I'm not necessarily proposing to apply all of them. I'm proposing patches 0001 through

Re: anonymous unions (C11)

2025-10-02 Thread Álvaro Herrera
On 2025-Sep-30, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > I found the compilation errors after pulling the latest sources at > that time. I thought the patch series is committed and hence this > report and patch. Didn't look at the patch series. Ah, okay. -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https:

Re: anonymous unions (C11)

2025-09-23 Thread Nathan Bossart
On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 11:38:22AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > That said, I did go overboard here and converted all the struct/union > combinations I could find, but I'm not necessarily proposing to apply > all of them. I'm proposing patches 0001 through 0004, which are > relatively simple or