On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 12:09 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 09:54:24AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Still, I think that your adjustment is right, as the check is, indeed,
> > on the DefElem's value*. Or you could just say "If no value given".
>
> Peter, I have applied
On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 09:54:24AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Still, I think that your adjustment is right, as the check is, indeed,
> on the DefElem's value*. Or you could just say "If no value given".
Peter, I have applied something using your original wording. This is
a minor issue, but
On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 09:53:01AM +1000, Peter Smith wrote:
> Really this code is for the case when there *was* a parameter given
> (e.g. "copy_data" in my example above) but when there is no parameter
> *value* given.
>
> Suggested comment fix:
> BEFORE
> If no parameter given, assume "true" is
