Re: doc: Make logical replication examples executable in bulk and legal sgml.

2025-05-26 Thread Amit Kapila
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 10:52 AM David G. Johnston wrote: > > On Thursday, May 22, 2025, Amit Kapila wrote: >> >> On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 9:33 PM David G. Johnston >> wrote: >> > >> > While responding to a "our documentation is buggy" complaint I got annoyed >> > in my attempt to reproduce the b

Re: doc: Make logical replication examples executable in bulk and legal sgml.

2025-05-22 Thread Amit Kapila
On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 9:33 PM David G. Johnston wrote: > > While responding to a "our documentation is buggy" complaint I got annoyed in > my attempt to reproduce the behavior by having to surgically copy > line-by-line the DDL and DML code involved. Let's strive for a more > copy-paste frien

Re: doc: Make logical replication examples executable in bulk and legal sgml.

2025-05-15 Thread David G. Johnston
On Thu, May 15, 2025, 19:28 Peter Smith wrote: > > > doesn't help bulk execution at all because the result gets in the way > so you'll still end up surgically copying each SELECT. Since it fixes > nothing I assumed you just commented the SELECT prompts for > consistency with the other ones, right

Re: doc: Make logical replication examples executable in bulk and legal sgml.

2025-05-15 Thread Peter Smith
On Sun, May 4, 2025 at 2:03 AM David G. Johnston wrote: > > While responding to a "our documentation is buggy" complaint I got annoyed in > my attempt to reproduce the behavior by having to surgically copy > line-by-line the DDL and DML code involved. Let's strive for a more > copy-paste frien