On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 5:47 AM Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> On 19.03.24 10:34, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> >>> "Only for local objects"
> >>> is there any reference explaining "local objects"?
> >>> I think local object means objects that only affect one single database?
> > That's a bigger
> On 21 Mar 2024, at 22:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> On 19.03.24 10:34, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
"Only for local objects"
is there any reference explaining "local objects"?
I think local object means objects that only affect one single database?
>> That's a bigger problem than
On 19.03.24 10:34, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
"Only for local objects"
is there any reference explaining "local objects"?
I think local object means objects that only affect one single database?
That's a bigger problem than the table representation, we never define what
"local object" mean
> On 19 Mar 2024, at 02:14, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 08:00:00AM +0800, jian he wrote:
>> I think the "X" and "-" mean in this matrix [0] is not very intuitive.
>> mainly because "X" tends to mean negative things in most cases.
>> we can write a sentence saying "X"
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 08:00:00AM +0800, jian he wrote:
> I think the "X" and "-" mean in this matrix [0] is not very intuitive.
> mainly because "X" tends to mean negative things in most cases.
> we can write a sentence saying "X" means this, "-" means that.
>
> or maybe Check mark [1] and
