Re: libpq-oauth: a mid-beta naming check

2025-08-07 Thread Jacob Champion
On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 8:44 AM Christoph Berg wrote: > Well, at the PG19 release time it will no longer be new. But the plan > sounds like a good one. Excellent. Thanks everybody! --Jacob

Re: libpq-oauth: a mid-beta naming check

2025-08-05 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Jacob Champion > On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 2:39 AM Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Aug 2025 at 01:20, Jacob Champion > > wrote: > > > So, as we approach Beta 3: can anyone think of a way that this plan will > > > fail? > > > > It's not entirely clear what plan exactly you talk about here

Re: libpq-oauth: a mid-beta naming check

2025-08-05 Thread Jacob Champion
On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 2:39 AM Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote: > On Tue, 5 Aug 2025 at 01:20, Jacob Champion > wrote: > > So, as we approach Beta 3: can anyone think of a way that this plan will > > fail? > > It's not entirely clear what plan exactly you talk about here. Are you > saying you want to re

Re: libpq-oauth: a mid-beta naming check

2025-08-05 Thread Jelte Fennema-Nio
On Tue, 5 Aug 2025 at 01:20, Jacob Champion wrote: > As far as I know, that > work necessarily includes designing a stable ABI and figuring out a > trusted place that users can put their plugins into. If we can do > both, I think we can get rid of the -MAJOR versioning scheme entirely, > because o