On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:33:09AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> sslfiles.mk doesn't depend on the rest of the buildsystem, and is a rarely
> executed command, so I don't see a problem with using make to update the
> files. At least for a long while.
Agreed to keep things simple for now, even if i
Hi,
On 2023-02-22 09:42:54 -0800, Jacob Champion wrote:
> I'm happy to contribute cycles to a Meson port when you're ready for
> it. From a skim it seems like maybe in-source generation isn't a focus for
> Meson [1]. They might encourage us to write custom Python for it anyway?
You'd normally jus
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 5:40 AM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> I think the tradeoff here is, given how rarely those rules are used, is
> it worth maintaining duplicate implementations or complicated bridging?
>
> It's clearly something to deal with eventually, but it's not high priority.
Yeah... in th
On 21.02.23 00:54, Michael Paquier wrote:
While playing with the SSL tests last week, I have noticed that we
don't have a way to regenerate the SSL files with meson for its TAP
suite. It seems to me that we had better transfer the rules currently
stored in sslfiles.mk into something that meson c
