Moin,
On Tue, May 8, 2018 5:03 pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 5/8/18 16:51, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>>> On 5/8/18 13:57, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
+ # take executable files that file(1) thinks are perl files
+ find . -type f -perm -100 -exec file {} \; -print |
On 5/8/18 16:51, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>> On 5/8/18 13:57, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> + # take executable files that file(1) thinks are perl files
>>> + find . -type f -perm -100 -exec file {} \; -print |
>>> + egrep -i ':.*perl[0-9]*\>' |
>
>> How portable is that?
>
>
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 5/8/18 13:57, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> +# take executable files that file(1) thinks are perl files
>> +find . -type f -perm -100 -exec file {} \; -print |
>> +egrep -i ':.*perl[0-9]*\>' |
> How portable is that?
Well, it's the same code that's in pgperlt
On 5/8/18 13:57, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> + # take executable files that file(1) thinks are perl files
> + find . -type f -perm -100 -exec file {} \; -print |
> + egrep -i ':.*perl[0-9]*\>' |
How portable is that?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL
