On 16/06/2020 18:28, Marc Cousin wrote:
> Oh, sorry about that, I forgot to detail this. I tested on both 10.13 (which
> is the production environment on which we faced this), and on 12.3, with the
> same problem.
>
> On 16/06/2020 17:51, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Marc Cousin writes:
>>> Of course, wh
Oh, sorry about that, I forgot to detail this. I tested on both 10.13 (which is
the production environment on which we faced this), and on 12.3, with the same
problem.
On 16/06/2020 17:51, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marc Cousin writes:
>> Of course, what happens here is that the histogram says that max(
Marc Cousin writes:
> Of course, what happens here is that the histogram says that max(a) is
> 100, and get_actual_variable_range verifies the real upper bound. And has
> to read quite a few dead index records.
We've revised that logic several times to reduce the scope of the
problem. Sinc
