Hi,
On Thu, 29 May 2025 at 02:32, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2025-05-28 22:51:14 +0930, Robins Tharakan wrote:
> Recently leafhopper failed again on the same test. For now I've paused it.
> > To rule out the compiler (and its maturity on the architecture), I'll
> > upgrade
> > gcc (to nightly, o
Hi,
On 2025-05-28 22:51:14 +0930, Robins Tharakan wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 15:20, David Rowley wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 16:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Failures like this one [1]:
> > >
> > > @@ -340,9 +340,13 @@
> > > create function myinthash(myint) returns integer strict immu
Robins Tharakan writes:
> I didn't dive in deeper but I see that indri failed recently [1] on what
> seems
> like the exact same test / line-number (at t/027_stream_regress.pl line 95)
> that leafhopper has been tripping on recently. The error is not verbatim,
> but it was a little too coincidenta
On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 15:20, David Rowley wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 16:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Failures like this one [1]:
> >
> > @@ -340,9 +340,13 @@
> > create function myinthash(myint) returns integer strict immutable
> language
> >internal as 'hashint4';
> > NOTICE: argument t
On 5/20/25 07:50, David Rowley wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 16:07, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Failures like this one [1]:
>>
>> @@ -340,9 +340,13 @@
>> create function myinthash(myint) returns integer strict immutable language
>>internal as 'hashint4';
>> NOTICE: argument type myint is only a
On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 16:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> Failures like this one [1]:
>
> @@ -340,9 +340,13 @@
> create function myinthash(myint) returns integer strict immutable language
>internal as 'hashint4';
> NOTICE: argument type myint is only a shell
> +ERROR: ROWS is not applicable when fun
David Rowley writes:
> Note that the actual row count is 1000 still, so that pretty much
> discounts corruption with the stored unique1 values. Unfortunately,
> that doesn't reduce the number of possible other reasons by very much.
Failures like this one [1]:
@@ -340,9 +340,13 @@
create functio
On Sat, 17 May 2025 at 01:19, Andres Freund wrote:
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
> -> Nested Loop (actual rows=1000.00 loops=N)
> -> Seq Scan on tenk1 t2 (actual rows=1000.00 loops=N)
> Filter: (unique1 < 1000)
> - Rows Removed by Filter: 9000
> +
Hi,
On 2025-05-19 12:49:26 +0930, Robins Tharakan wrote:
> Hi Andres,
>
> On Fri, 16 May 2025 at 22:49, Andres Freund wrote:
> >
> > There have been other odd things on leafhopper, see e.g.:
> >
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/35d87371-f3ab-42c8-9aac-bb39ab5bd987%40gmail.com
> > https://
Hi Andres,
On Fri, 16 May 2025 at 22:49, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> There have been other odd things on leafhopper, see e.g.:
>
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/35d87371-f3ab-42c8-9aac-bb39ab5bd987%40gmail.com
> https://postgr.es/m/Z4npAKvchWzKfb_r%40paquier.xyz
>
Any chances this could be li
is there different tables "Seq Scan on tenk1 t2" and "Seq Scan on tenk1
t1", so it might not be a bug, isn't it?
On 16.05.2025 09:19, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
I noticed this recent BF failure:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=leafhopper&dt=2025-05-15%2008%3A10%3A04
===
11 matches
Mail list logo
