On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 22:59:48 +0100
Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 1 Feb 2024, at 02:21, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:44:28 +0100
> > Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> >> -setup_cancel_handler(void)
> >> +pg_dump_setup_cancel_handler(void)
> >>
> >> We don't have any other
> On 1 Feb 2024, at 02:21, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:44:28 +0100
> Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> -setup_cancel_handler(void)
>> +pg_dump_setup_cancel_handler(void)
>>
>> We don't have any other functions prefixed with pg_dump_, based on the naming
>> of the surrounding code in
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:44:28 +0100
Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 26 Jan 2024, at 01:42, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
>
> > I am proposing it because there is a public function with
> > the same name in fe_utils/cancel.c. I know pg_dump/parallel.c
> > does not include fe_utils/cancel.h, so there is no
> On 26 Jan 2024, at 01:42, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> I am proposing it because there is a public function with
> the same name in fe_utils/cancel.c. I know pg_dump/parallel.c
> does not include fe_utils/cancel.h, so there is no conflict,
> but I think it is better to use different names to reduce
>
Hi,
Attached is a simple patch to rename setup_cancel_handler()
in pg_dump/parallel.c.
I am proposing it because there is a public function with
the same name in fe_utils/cancel.c. I know pg_dump/parallel.c
does not include fe_utils/cancel.h, so there is no conflict,
but I think it is better
