On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 05:49:36PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I propose that in v13 we redefine "MD" (from md.c) to mean "main data"
> (instead of "magnetic disk"). That's the standard storage layout for
> typical table and index AMs. As opposed to the proposed undo and SLRU
> SMGRs
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 05:49:36PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I propose that in v13 we redefine "MD" (from md.c) to mean "main data"
> (instead of "magnetic disk"). That's the standard storage layout for
> typical table and index AMs. As opposed to the proposed undo and SLRU
> SMGRs
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 05:49:36PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I propose that in v13 we redefine "MD" (from md.c) to mean "main data"
> (instead of "magnetic disk"). That's the standard storage layout for
> typical table and index AMs. As opposed to the proposed undo and SLRU
> SMGRs that provid
Hello,
I propose that in v13 we redefine "MD" (from md.c) to mean "main data"
(instead of "magnetic disk"). That's the standard storage layout for
typical table and index AMs. As opposed to the proposed undo and SLRU
SMGRs that provide layouts specialised for different life cycles.
--
Thomas M
