On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 02:09:37PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-08-17 at 09:37 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > I have just noticed that we do not have a CF entry for this proposal,
> > so I have added one with Laurenz as author:
> > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/44/4504/
>
> I
On Thu, 2023-08-17 at 09:37 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I have just noticed that we do not have a CF entry for this proposal,
> so I have added one with Laurenz as author:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/44/4504/
I have changed the author to Fujii Masao.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:50:45AM +0530, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing the patch and adding a CF entry for it. PFA patch
> that addresses your review comments.
That looks OK seen from here. Perhaps others have more comments?
> And... Sorry for the delayed response. I totally
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 6:07 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 05:02:09PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > if (kill(PostmasterPid, SIGUSR1) != 0)
> > {
> > -ereport(WARNING,
> > -(errmsg("failed to send signal to postmaster:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 05:02:09PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> if (kill(PostmasterPid, SIGUSR1) != 0)
> {
> -ereport(WARNING,
> -(errmsg("failed to send signal to postmaster: %m")));
> (void) unlink(PROMOTE_SIGNAL_FILE);
> -
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 04:53:50PM +0530, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Laurenz and Fujii-san. I've prepared
> a patch that makes pg_promote error out if it couldn't send SIGUSR1 to
> the postmaster or if the postmaster died in the middle of standby
> promotion. PFA.
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:55 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2023/06/07 2:00, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 16:35 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> >> At present, pg_promote() returns true to the caller on successful
> >> promotion of standby, however it returns false in multiple
On 2023/06/07 2:00, Laurenz Albe wrote:
On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 16:35 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
At present, pg_promote() returns true to the caller on successful
promotion of standby, however it returns false in multiple scenarios
which includes:
1) The SIGUSR1 signal could not be sent to
On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 16:35 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> At present, pg_promote() returns true to the caller on successful
> promotion of standby, however it returns false in multiple scenarios
> which includes:
>
> 1) The SIGUSR1 signal could not be sent to the postmaster process.
> 2) The
Hi All,
At present, pg_promote() returns true to the caller on successful
promotion of standby, however it returns false in multiple scenarios
which includes:
1) The SIGUSR1 signal could not be sent to the postmaster process.
2) The postmaster died during standby promotion.
3) Standby couldn't
10 matches
Mail list logo
