On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 2:52 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> OK, let me step back. Why are people resetting the statistics
> regularly? Based on that purpose, does it make sense to clear the
> stats that effect autovacuum?
>
When I've done it (not regularly, thankfully), it was usually because I
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 09:11:52AM -0500, Joe Conway wrote:
On 4/13/19 3:42 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
If only we had a way to regularly snapshot the data from within the
database, and then compute the deltas on that. If only we could insert
data from one table into another one a then do some
On 4/13/19 3:42 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> If only we had a way to regularly snapshot the data from within the
> database, and then compute the deltas on that. If only we could insert
> data from one table into another one a then do some analysics on it,
> with like small windows moving over the
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 08:09:34PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
Em qua, 10 de abr de 2019 às 16:33, Alvaro Herrera
escreveu:
On 2019-Apr-10, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 04:14:11AM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> > I still think we should start with a warning about
On 27/03/2019 22:28, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-03-26 16:28, Euler Taveira wrote:
>> I don't remember why we didn't consider table without stats to be
>> ANALYZEd. Isn't it the case to fix autovacuum? Analyze
>> autovacuum_count + vacuum_count = 0?
>
> When the autovacuum system was
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 06:52, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> OK, let me step back. Why are people resetting the statistics
> regularly? Based on that purpose, does it make sense to clear the
> stats that effect autovacuum?
I can't speak for everyone, but once upon a time when I first started
using
Em qua, 10 de abr de 2019 às 16:33, Alvaro Herrera
escreveu:
>
> On 2019-Apr-10, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 04:14:11AM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
>
> > > I still think we should start with a warning about pg_stat_reset().
> > > People are surprised by this, and these are
On 2019-Apr-10, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 04:14:11AM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> > I still think we should start with a warning about pg_stat_reset().
> > People are surprised by this, and these are just the ones who notice:
> >
> >
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 04:14:11AM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 00:59, Robert Haas wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 7:49 PM David Rowley
> > wrote:
> > > Yeah, analyze, not vacuum. It is a bit scary to add new ways for
> > > auto-vacuum to suddenly have a lot of
On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 00:59, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 7:49 PM David Rowley
> wrote:
> > Yeah, analyze, not vacuum. It is a bit scary to add new ways for
> > auto-vacuum to suddenly have a lot of work to do. When all workers
> > are busy it can lead to neglect of other
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 7:49 PM David Rowley
wrote:
> Yeah, analyze, not vacuum. It is a bit scary to add new ways for
> auto-vacuum to suddenly have a lot of work to do. When all workers
> are busy it can lead to neglect of other duties. It's true that there
> won't be much in the way of
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 10:33, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> On 2019-Mar-27, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > On 2019-03-26 16:28, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > > I don't remember why we didn't consider table without stats to be
> > > ANALYZEd. Isn't it the case to fix autovacuum? Analyze
> > >
On 2019-Mar-27, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-03-26 16:28, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > I don't remember why we didn't consider table without stats to be
> > ANALYZEd. Isn't it the case to fix autovacuum? Analyze
> > autovacuum_count + vacuum_count = 0?
>
> When the autovacuum system was
On 2019-03-26 16:28, Euler Taveira wrote:
> I don't remember why we didn't consider table without stats to be
> ANALYZEd. Isn't it the case to fix autovacuum? Analyze
> autovacuum_count + vacuum_count = 0?
When the autovacuum system was introduced, we didn't have those columns.
But now it seems
Em ter, 26 de mar de 2019 às 09:54, David Rowley
escreveu:
>
> As I mentioned in [1], I've had a few cases recently about auto-vacuum
> not working. On the other thread, it was all about auto-vacuum being
> configured to run too slowly. The other culprit for auto-vacuum not
> working is when
As I mentioned in [1], I've had a few cases recently about auto-vacuum
not working. On the other thread, it was all about auto-vacuum being
configured to run too slowly. The other culprit for auto-vacuum not
working is when people periodically use pg_stat_reset().
The problem with
16 matches
Mail list logo
