Re: Solaris "sed" versus pre-v13 plpython tests

2022-09-03 Thread Noah Misch
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 11:10:35AM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2022-Aug-31, Noah Misch wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 06:25:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > > I am not completely sure why buildfarm member wrasse isn't failing > > > similarly > > > > wrasse disabled plpython in v12-,

Re: Solaris "sed" versus pre-v13 plpython tests

2022-09-01 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On 2022-Aug-31, Noah Misch wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 06:25:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > I am not completely sure why buildfarm member wrasse isn't failing > > similarly > > wrasse disabled plpython in v12-, from day one, due to this and a crash bug > that I shelved. I will be

Re: Solaris "sed" versus pre-v13 plpython tests

2022-08-31 Thread Noah Misch
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 06:25:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I am not completely sure why buildfarm member wrasse isn't failing > similarly wrasse disabled plpython in v12-, from day one, due to this and a crash bug that I shelved. I will be interested to see how margay reacts to your fix.

Re: Solaris "sed" versus pre-v13 plpython tests

2022-08-31 Thread Tom Lane
I wrote: > I confirmed on the gcc farm's Solaris 11 box that the pattern > doesn't work as expected with /usr/bin/sed: > tgl@gcc-solaris11:~$ echo except foo, bar: | sed -e 's/except > \([[:alpha:]][[:alpha:].]*\), *\([[:alpha:]][[:alpha:]]*\):/except \1 as > \2:/g' > except foo, bar: > We

Solaris "sed" versus pre-v13 plpython tests

2022-08-31 Thread Tom Lane
I noticed that buildfarm member margay, which just recently started running tests on REL_12_STABLE, is failing the plpython tests in that branch [1], though it's happy in v13 and later. The failures appear due to syntax errors in Python "except" statements, and it's visible in some of the tests