On 2025-Nov-04, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Over at [1] Vaibhav complained that the patch was deleting a line following
> one of the case branches for handling command line options in pg_restore.c,
> and said this was not pertinent to the patch. That's reasonable, but it made
> me look into $subject a
On 2025-11-05 We 11:41 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 04.11.25 20:32, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Over at [1] Vaibhav complained that the patch was deleting a line
following one of the case branches for handling command line options
in pg_restore.c, and said this was not pertinent to the patch. Tha
On 04.11.25 20:32, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Over at [1] Vaibhav complained that the patch was deleting a line
following one of the case branches for handling command line options in
pg_restore.c, and said this was not pertinent to the patch. That's
reasonable, but it made me look into $subject a b
Over at [1] Vaibhav complained that the patch was deleting a line
following one of the case branches for handling command line options in
pg_restore.c, and said this was not pertinent to the patch. That's
reasonable, but it made me look into $subject a bit. pg_restore.c has a
mixture, with some
